<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delegation on Trym Nohr Fjørtoft</title>
    <link>https://www.trymnf.com/tags/delegation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Delegation on Trym Nohr Fjørtoft</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026, Trym Nohr Fjørtoft.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.trymnf.com/tags/delegation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Delegation without a Coherent Nation: Non-Majoritarianism in EU and US Single Market Governance.</title>
      <link>https://www.trymnf.com/publications/delegation-cep/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.trymnf.com/publications/delegation-cep/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Non-majoritarian institutions like independent agencies and central banks play a significant role in market governance in the EU, the U.S., and everywhere. For many scholars, however, delegation to non-majoritarian institutions requires the embedding in a single, coherent democratic people in order to be legitimate. This view underlies many of the strongest normative critiques of the EU, where the substantial powers of non-majoritarian institutions like the Commisison, the European Central Bank, and many decentralized agencies enjoy no such justification. I argue that this com-mon normative account relies on an unsustainable notion of cultural and political coherence as a prerequisite for legitimacy. In its place, I defend a theory of legitimacy which builds on robust claims to the common good, expertise, and value inputs—all authorized and controlled by thinner democratic procedures. Using the example of single-market governance in the EU and the U.S., I show that legitimacy assessments which presuppose strong cultural and political coherence over-state the differences between the two polities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
